@ericbuijs We have to be very careful about setting privacy expectations: there is no #privacy in the #ActivityPub protocol/#mastodon/the #fediverse.
mastodon.ar.al/web/@aral/10925…
ar.al🌻 (@aral@mastodon.ar.al)
Dear #TwitterMigration folks, an important tip on #privacy on the fediverse: There is none. This is a public medium; please treat it as such.Aral’s Mastodon
mathew 🦜☕
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •Aral Balkan
in reply to mathew 🦜☕ • • •8Petros [$ rm -rv /capitalism/*] likes this.
8Petros [$ rm -rv /capitalism/*] reshared this.
mathew 🦜☕
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •Aral Balkan
in reply to mathew 🦜☕ • • •But we’re talking about end-to-end encryption and private messaging. Removing the ability for people to communicate privately wouldn’t do anything to stop bad actors, it would just make private communication illegal. And guess who are great at doing illegal things… that’s right, bad actors :)
What it would also do, of course, is allow corporations and governments to further skew the power dynamic in their favour and, eventually, to erode the very concept of personhood.
mathew 🦜☕
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •I have no problem with end-to-end encrypted messaging for 1-on-1 communication, or 1-to-small-group.
Where it becomes problematic is if you imagine K*w*farms or 8k*n, but decentralized enough to be unstoppable, and with everything encrypted so that nobody would know what was going on until it was far too late.
I think people building social networks need to put more effort into making sure they're not building or enabling a more effective K*w*farms.
8Petros [$ rm -rv /capitalism/*]
in reply to mathew 🦜☕ • •ZS4gSXQgaXMgYWJvdXQgdGhlIGtleXMgYmVpbmcgYXZhaWxhYmxlIG9yIG5vdC4K