Przejdź do głównej zawartości



While a physical dictionary is helpful for shared knowledge, your personal mental dictionary is customized based on your individual experiences. What words are in my mental dictionary might overlap with the mental dictionary of someone else who also speaks the same language, but there will also be a lot of differences between the content of our dictionaries.


#linguistics #neuroscience #language #words #brain #neurology #semantics #Neurolinguistics #Psycholinguistics #Speechtherapy



reshared this



#LSD #psychodeliki #neuroplastyczność #badania

Okazało się, że LSD ma wpływ na szlaki metaboliczne, które mają związek z neuroplastycznością. Dotyczy to między innymi związku znanego jako kinaza mTOR (od mechanistic Target Of Rapamycin). Chodzi tu o kluczową proteinę, mającą znaczenie w procesach fizjologicznych, która jest swoistym centrum odpowiadającym za neuroplastyczność, pamięć i uczenie się.


The mission of techno-optimists appears to be to pick up where the European and American empires of the 19th century left off, using technological, political and economic power to bully, coerce and bludgeon other societies into acquiescence.

For Andreessen, all this is supported, like colonialism, by a kind of social Darwinism. He sees an evolutionary war in which “smart people and smart societies outperform less smart ones on virtually every metric we can measure”.

Andreessen writes “technology doesn’t care about your ethnicity, race, religion, national origin, gender, sexuality, political views, height, weight, hair or lack thereof”. However, his talk of “America and her allies” and “our civilisation” suggests Andreessen himself cares quite a bit about these things. The West should, he implies, embrace its rightful place as the world’s technological (and civilisational) leader.





#Ukraina #eksport #żywność #raport #OSW via #myRSS




#China #Russia #Food via #MyRSS #OSW


At a basic level, the promise of our supply-and-demand #capitalism is that those who want a good or service are willing to pay more for it. But that’s illogical, because those who want or need goods the most may not be able to pay top dollar for them.

The result of this flawed logic has been that even the threat of disruptions to #grain supply have driven prices high and placed populations in countries across Africa, the Middle East and Asia at risk of #hunger.

The #financialization of everything, including basic needs, is just one mechanism of #neoliberal capitalism, and it reveals the dangers of turning basic needs into commodities.

in reply to 8Petros [$ rm -rv /capitalism/*]

I assume you meant to say that those who want it more will pay more for it (otherwise, well, yes? people who don't want a good will not pay for it by definition, ones who do want it will pay something, so they will pay more).

What I find hard to reason about in this area is comparing how much _different people_ want something. I can tell how (in a world of perfectly honest and omniscient people who will answer all questions) to tell whether one person wants X more than Y ("what would you do if you could pick one of them only?"). Do you have a candidate definition (or something that points in the direction of one) for comparisons of wants between different people?