Przejdź do głównej zawartości

in reply to 8Petros [$ rm -rv /capitalism/*]

yea, no, they tried that already in 2020 and it didn't work. It led to the rise of the far right lol
in reply to MoneroIsTheFuture

FYI, the gist of anarchism is: No concentration of power of any kind.
It never happened in the USA at large.
in reply to 8Petros [$ rm -rv /capitalism/*]

uhhh the country was on fire after a month long declaration that laws were not to be upheld across the country. That is anarchy by definition: a lawless society. I don't want to hear that babble. There are other anarchist societies, and they themselves have rules because anarchy isn't a state of permanence; a rule of law must be upheld or else the state of anarchy itself will give way to some new form of spontaneously formed government. Anyone who studies government and/or sociology will tell you anarchy is a transitionary phase of a society. Look up scholary articles on the subject if you don't believe me.
in reply to MoneroIsTheFuture

That is anarchy by definition: a lawless society


please get informed before you go any further. Seriously: anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionA…

If the articles you mentioned are written following the definitiion you propose, they have as much merit as USSR-made critique of democracy, or Christian analysis od atheism.

If you find something less biased and of good quality, I would be happy to read it. Something like this, for instance:
plato.stanford.edu/entries/ana…

in reply to 8Petros [$ rm -rv /capitalism/*]

Or we can try something more practical, realistic, and more likely to actually be accepted by Americans (as opposed to anarchism), like state socialism.
in reply to ☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭

State is a state, is a state. And the state always claims to be "more practical, realistic, and more likely to actually be accepted" - be it socialist, capitalist or feudal. Have fun, anyway.