Within 24 hours of a person’s mental health crisis, open dialogue aims to provide a safe space for family, friends and mental health practitioner to come together and try to make sense of the experience. It is often in a home or a non-clinical setting. Using open-ended questions, such as: ‘how would you like to use your time today?’ It feels less like an interview for a diagnosis and more of a collaboration between people with differing expertise, whether personal or professional.
[...]
It is well documented that community and a strong support network can be powerful agents of recovery. Looking at World Health Organization data on outcomes for psychosis, for example, people who live in low-income countries often have better outcomes than people in the UK.While this response is often mistakenly tied to an absence of medication, the key elements are social togetherness, dignity, and a safe place to heal. Open dialogue, in other words, might help introduce these core principles into wealthier countries that have become over-medicalised in their approach to mental health care. By formalising the ‘social network approach’ through rigorous testing and data, we may return to a model of care that happens by default in countries outside of the western world.
Anyone here familiar with this approach? I am asking for people struggling with expensive, privatised and fossilised #psychiatry here in #Poland, and even more in #Ukraine.
#MentalHealth #OpenDialog #Psychiatry #community #support
The Nordic way: why the alternative Finnish approach to psychosis is going global - Positive News
Developed by Finnish doctors in the 1980s, 'open dialogue' dramatically improves outcomes for those in crisisAlex Riley (Positive News)
Olga Matná-Schrödingerová reshared this.