Przejdź do głównej zawartości


I suspect the fediverse is more than just a substitute for other social media. I see this as the beginning of a phase change in how we use the web. We are shifting from corporate control to community control. Fundamentally, the fediverse is a cooperative endeavor, instead of a competitive one. I look forward to the shift in mindset that this change brings about. Will there be a similar movement towards cooperative organizations in other areas of our lives? Once people have had a taste of this approach, will they not be eager to see it spread?
in reply to Aaron

What if the business world worked this way? What if we turn it completely upside down, and run things from the bottom up instead of top down? Is there anything that the current business world does that can't be done just as well or better through a federated, cooperative approach?
in reply to Aaron

Can we be free of the oligarchy, by rendering them obsolete? No more milking the helpless consumers and workers for resources, because we decided to do it without them?
in reply to Aaron

When we need things, or have things to share, we can just reach out to our neighbors, instead of to megacorporations that only see dollar bills when they look at human beings. We can reach out to an organization that we *belong* to, and that belongs to *us* in turn. An organization that we *made*. Just for us, the way we want it to work, not how some rich investor wants it to work, just so they can shove ads we don't want to see in our faces or manipulate us into paying them for things that we dont want and that don't make our lives better.
Ten wpis został zedytowany (1 rok temu)
in reply to Aaron

Let's make this the beginning of a phase change. A different way to live. A different way to think. We *don't* need them. We can rebuild the system from the ground up to serve us, instead of us serving it.
in reply to Aaron

Can this taken back to today’s equiv. of the past’s ‘pioneers’?
As you’d said earlier, as I recall in pieces: rather than paying Joe Blow Inc. top extra coin, for the newes version of the flashing lights Bell & Whistle 3000 Deluxe, for labour and cost, those of us who know the portions could build for immeasurably cheaper.
It is harder work that way but …. compare the old days to day:
- old: made from ‘stone’
- today: made from soggy cardboard

😕
in reply to Ryk ✌🏻🖖🏽🇨🇦

@rykthekreator I think we can decide for ourselves what the cost/benefit ratio is that's best. Cooperatives can be big or small, so there's no limit on the manufacturing process except what you're willing to pay for the labor & parts. But whatever we do, it won't be inflated by the extra drain of profit for shareholders at every step along the way.
in reply to Aaron

Agreed, all around.

It is funny to look back at all of the lived through / experienced periods; realizing the internal, progression from. It helps to realize further of it, with greater ease. Externally as possibilities as well.

That all can easily be used alone to determine the overall value, as opposed to excessive profiting.
Security for others? From externally influenced fears of falling / failing, with extra amounts of ‘this that and more’ … just, in case?
in reply to Ryk ✌🏻🖖🏽🇨🇦

@rykthekreator
The US learned how effective propaganda was in Germany. So we did our own propaganda to help beat them. Then in the post-WWII years, the propagandists turned to other targets. Cold war & such. Once the USSR dissolved, they instead turned their sights on us.
in reply to Aaron

I share the same hopes, but I guess you can’t apply the same model in other fields where business corporates grow stronger (I would be happy to be proven wrong)
in reply to sbarrax aka Marco Frattola

@sbarrax I think you would be pleasantly surprised. You probably already do business with cooperatives and don't realize it. They tend to fly under the radar, not being flashy and abrasive and in your face just to make a buck, focusing instead on serving the community. If you search large cooperatives you'll likely find a lot of very familiar names.
in reply to Aaron

@sbarrax They tend to agglomerate (aka federate) over time, being by nature cooperative instead of competitive.
in reply to Aaron

As long as it does not turn into the ‘next door’ current. My neighbors have some undercurrents that make me ill
in reply to Victoria

@runkleva In this version, we get to choose our neighborhood and our neighbors!
in reply to Aaron

at some point cooperatives will simply replace the need for this other bs

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Steve E

@steveediger On a long enough timescale, it seems inevitable! Cooperatives are more robust that other businesses, and they tend to spawn more of themselves and conglomerate into larger organizations.

Sadly, things move slowly, in no small part because cooperatives often have little use for advertising. (A *huge* plus, IMO. Ads torture me especially, thanks to my sensory sensitivities.)

I also worry about interference from government, particularly with corporations using their extracted profits to legally bribe our politicians to make laws that favor them more and more so they can keep increasing those profits.
in reply to Aaron

big tech is welcome to run their own nodes in the federation, that's the beauty of it. But the federation slays their oligarch control.

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Aaron

Quote tweets and search, apparently. I don't particularly miss it so far, but there they are(n't).
in reply to Nihl L'Amas

@NIH_LLAMAS Yeah, but Mastodon is open source. The community can address that, too, if there's even a demand for it.
in reply to Aaron

The cooperative business model is an attractive alternative to traditional capitalist models of ownership. Cooperatives focus on access, rather than profit, and provide access to goods or services in a way that is equitable for all members. This type of business model has been used successfully in many industries, such as grocery stores, agricultural production, and banking. I look forward to seeing more widespread adoption of this approach.

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Richard Rawson

@richardrawson Musk kind of did us a huge favor when he tore down Twitter and Mastodon was waiting to pick up the slack. Now tons of people are getting first hand exposure to the bottom-up approach that is the fundamental spirit of cooperatives, and what a relief it can be after endless corporate fatigue.

JonChevreau reshared this.

in reply to Aaron

I completely agree. I've experienced a greater sense of community in just a short while here than I ever did in 13+ years over there.

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Aaron

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Language

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Aaron

I certainly am seeing this. My whole life is dedicated to cooperatives, and I'm seeing a lot of co-op formations around the world. In India, they just established a government ministry of cooperatives.

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Steve E

@steveediger Exciting stuff! :D

I think the fediverse is giving a ton of people direct exposure to the basic model. I mean, most co-ops don't function on donations, as a rule, but the core is there: A collective endeavor where everyone benefits, with no profit motive. Open source is another great example of the same kind of approach, which is arguably what gave birth to the fediverse, or at least to Mastodon.

I really hope that once it becomes a familiar thing to people, they will see it as a natural way to organize for all their needs. I can't shake the vision of an entire economy run as cooperatives. How much better *everything* would be!
in reply to Aaron

I just talked about this today at our monthly Tech Worker Co-ops Peer Network (US Federation of Worker Cooperatives). The Fediverse meets a healthy portion of the requirement to turn every instance into a multi-stakeholder coop, with consumers paying low monthly fees, admins and developers getting paid for their work, and producers offering their products at cost.

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Steve E

@steveediger I've been waiting to see other people make the connection.

Small monthly dues can guarantee availability, and people could individually sponsor those who can't pay, or vote to cover their dues collectively.
in reply to Aaron

@steveediger Or they can just do it like it's already being done -- donation only. The admin can just ask for help if they need it.
in reply to Aaron

sure, that works and may be necessary now, but it's not sustainable in the long run.

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Steve E

@steveediger Agreed! As @miriamrobern just pointed out on another subthread, right now each instance is essentially a benevolent dictatorship.

Should any one of these admins decide to stop being benevolent, or the members as a whole decide not to contribute financially, it will break down. It needs to be made official, as an actual cooperative.
in reply to Aaron

@miriamrobern all the more reason to provide the stability of a commonly-owned/governed cooperative

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Aaron

the internet evolution has been a really interesting. We all were hooked by the dopamine peddler silos that like the frog, we didn't feel the water warming.

Federated is what the internet *is* at it's core.

To coopt a phrase "Nature is healing" as people are reawakened to the concept of federated. And if they need an example of how it works....it's just email for social media

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Pusher Of Pixels (old account)

@pixelpusher220

That's funny! I just used the same analogy of frogs boiling. It's a very apt analogy for how everything works now. Some new startup is amazing...kind, caring, responsive, helpful...and everybody lines up for what they've created. And then the investors start pushing them to make a profit. The value the startup provided to consumers becomes nothing more than a lure, a way to extract money out of us by any means necessary, for strangers who care nothing about the people they are damaging. All that work to build something meaningful and valuable to society is eventually torn down and turned into a resource extraction machine.
in reply to Aaron

@pixelpusher220

Monetization is just another word for predation, but one that's polite to the people doing it. Same goes for profit, interest, and rent. The predation needs to end. I'm fine with people making money by actually contributing to society, but nobody should be allowed to hold us down and milk us for all we're worth. And that's what basically every business does now.
in reply to Aaron

In the olden times, the internet itself was largely a community-run endeavor. Many websites would go offline when the owner turned off their computer and went to bed. ISPs rented closet space in commercial offices to store servers. Everyone ran a BB. It was much fun.

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Aaron

I'd love to see that, but we're going to need to see actual community-run, community-supported, community-governed instances first. Right now it's a bunch of individuals running a server on their own dime for funsies. I feel like the next big step is experimenting with actual functional self-governance, and not a thousand benevolent dictatorships.

reshared this

in reply to Miriam Robern

@miriamrobern Yes, exactly! I'd be up for joining an instance that is actually run as a cooperative, even if it means paying for the service.
in reply to Aaron

@datacoop is a danish "co op cloud", mastodon included. They share their code, maybe you could ask about their experience?

https://data.coop/tjenester/

@miriamrobern

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to notsoloud

@notsoloud @datacoop @miriamrobern Thanks! I'd also like to get some advice from people who have been involved in starting a coop before, and then share that with the people already running instances who might be interested in going that direction.
in reply to Aaron

creo que tienes razón, el fediverso es la descentralizacion del pensamiento, y los cambios sociales siempre inician cuando un grupo de personas, mientras más grande mejor, se ponen a pensar juntos en cómo arreglar el mundo. De alguna manera, el fediverso es como los cafés parisinos de la Ilustración, veremos a donde nos lleva eso

Aaron reshared this.

Unknown parent

Aaron
@Cassandra I sure hope so! I suspect that with a cooperative-based economy, UBI wouldn't be nearly as necessary, because money wouldn't be continually scooped out of the hands of every day people and dumped into a few wealthy shareholders' bank accounts. Instead, it would be recycled back into the very same community it came from, since the community owns the business. But there will always be a risk of someone falling on hard times, even then, so UBI would still be important.
in reply to Aaron

The most important part about fediverse is that it's a decentralised network, not a distributed one, as it is often misrepresented. The base entity is an instance / community and, to have real influence on the instance's policies, people need to form a community and keep maintaining it.
In Artel's pipeline we have a Seedbed project, being a platform coop for incubation of small community instances.
Anyone interested in early onboarding, talk to me, please.

Symbolic representation:

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Aaron

No Mastodon, please. It is an epitome of "benevolent" autocracy.
Working hypotheses:
#Misskey or #Akkoma for microblogging.
#Friendica for mezoblogging
#Halcyon for multi-instance access online (mosaic identity)
#Husky for mobile app (ditto)

#Yunohost as a platform for communities going on their own.

Several "2nd level" services, to be discussed.

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Aaron

@squish
@actuallyautistic
@neuro
#ActuallyAutistic

I heard that there was some trouble with the @neurodifferent.me server recently, due to a lot of strain & pressure falling on the admin and some technical issues as well. I have a lot of friends on this server, being #autistic myself. What do you folks think about forming a #cooperative and chipping in together to form a more stable arrangement that ensures both that the server is maintained and the admin isn't overloaded? I would love to see a more cohesive community form around this instance.

#ActuallyAutistic
#Neurodiversity

@8petros
in reply to Aaron

I will be happy to help, if needed, but I am ok with my little Petroskowo. My mission in this respect is to build a platform coop as described in my presentation (linked few minutes ago) to flatten the curve for communities like you suggest to form.
Let's talk what synergy can we get here - @COMFY Tech Artel Poznań will be a good space to try it, I hope.

reshared this

in reply to Aaron

@squish @actuallyautistic @neuro @8petros

Might be interesting, I'd be curious to follow and see how it works. I've been administrating my own instance with a couple of friends to see how things work. So far it is still a good solution for me, but I will be really glad to see that community form too. A lot of posts from neurodivergent.me are already reaching my feeds, so I can see plenty at the moment :)

Great idea, good luck!

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Vincent

@vincent @squish @actuallyautistic @neuro @8petros I have an understanding of how organizations work, and how people are incentivized by different forms of organizational structures, but I am the worst person in the world to actually implement these things. I don't know law, finance, business, etc. Just incentive structures, which I learned through my machine learning background and interest in economics.

The point being, I know it's a good thing to do, but I lack the expertise on actually making a legally incorporated cooperative. Hoping others can pick up where my own skills end abruptly. I'll be along for the ride to learn, too, if possible.
in reply to Aaron

I really hope people get it, because as of now Mastodon is actually reaching Twitter scale but for example in Italy the vast majority of folks just use Instagram for anything. And it’s really frustrating
in reply to Alessio :linux:

@dottorblaster In time it will catch on. Eventually they'll figure out that Instagram (and all corporate offerings like it) are using and abusing them. And most people don't go back once they've found an alternative that doesn't suck like that.
in reply to Aaron

I agree, I just hope that people really realize this kind of stuff and don't lose hype just because Fediverse isn't the "hype of the day"
Unknown parent

Aaron
@Cassandra meeeee too!
in reply to Aaron

To whom it may interest: I have just started putting together a map of the #Artel #SeedBed concept. Very much work-in-progress, but you are welcome to look over my shoulder.

SeedBed.km

By the end of the week it will be published in the feed of @COMFY Tech Artel Poznań for public scrutiny. Meanwhile, feel free to drop me any remark you see fit.

reshared this

in reply to Aaron

I hope this will be a beginning for more good things...🙏
A great movement....
I hope that...🙏
in reply to Aaron

Yes, #Fediverse is different as it's a product of civil society rather than business interests. I doubt it's popularity will really move the needle any more then the widespread adoption of #FOSS has.

The basic structure of democratic states is partly #P2P (one person, one vote), but even that notion is now under threat by authoritarians. The phase change that needs to happen is a political and ethical one, but most people eschew thinking on this level.

Aaron reshared this.

Unknown parent

Aaron
@lori Can you give me a summary/intro/segue? It starts in pretty densely, and I'm not sure I've got the right frame of reference to make full sense of what's being discussed in this article or how it relates to what I was saying.
in reply to Aaron

What you are describing is very similar to the evolution of #freesoftware . Unsurprisingly, it scared some organizations and it was then neutralized into open source.
in reply to federico

@federico3 I don't see it as being "neutralized". I'm a huge fan of open source, and it's a big part of why we are able to have this conversation. Anything that's open source is also free in the original sense, but it also has the advantage of being fully transparent, so anyone who wants to can confirm the code they are running behaves as advertised, or offer up improvements and bug fixes. It makes it possible not only to share your work as a developer, but to build on each other's work.
in reply to Aaron

Humanity has survived to this point because of cooperation, and evolution favoring cooperation. Paradoxically, we have evolved to the point where the uncooperative also survive.

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Aaron

when it comes to racism and bigotry, the fediverse is no different, though. It is incredibly white here. Minority voices are barely heard.

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Inaya Shujaat عنايه شجاعت 🇳🇿

@inaya That's one reason I go out of my way to follow minorities of all sorts. I make a conscious effort to broaden my horizons and hear the perspectives of people who face different challenges from myself, and I advocate the same for other people. I get what it's like to be different, being neurodivergent myself, but there are still things I don't know much about and have to intentionally educate myself on, whether it's the different challenges faced by those with physical disabilities or the nuances of systemic racism.
in reply to Aaron

I do the same. I’d also like to think that doing so has helped me to not only learn a lot about different communities, but to grow as an individual. Listening to their voices is key in developing true empathy, with understanding and genuine compassion.

I also use my own experiences to help me to understand the experiences of others, and why it’s so damn important to support and listen to them.

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Aaron

Interesting perspective and questions... I think people will group together into tribes in the same way they do everywhere. This is what humans do. It comes from an evolutionary history where we vanquished the majority of Neandethals, Denisovans, etc. Those remaining were absorbed into us. The thing I appreciate the most about the Fediverse is the lack of ads. Capitalism and its corporatists use ads to subvert humans into wasteful consumers. I personally would have no problem taxing the crap out of advertising and/or outlawing mist altogether. If a "consumer" requires something in particular, they already know where to go.

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to 🍄🌈🎮💻🚲🥓🎃💀🏴🛻🇺🇸

@schizanon It's not just philosophical. People lack experience with cooperatives as a business structure. Mastodon is providing that, which will give people a window into a different way things can work. One of the major problems with the world today is the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few oligarchs through corporations. Cooperatives are the antidote to that.
in reply to 🍄🌈🎮💻🚲🥓🎃💀🏴🛻🇺🇸

@schizanon Okay. You don't get it, and you don't have to. But don't waste both our times trying to make me stop talking just because you don't see what I see.
Unknown parent

Aaron
@another_katt @kralcttam I feel like back then, the internet was much more bottom-up than top-down. Now it's like everything comes from a corporation, or is managed and controlled by one to suit their purposes. And since corporations by design exist to extract $$ out of our pockets, they are intrinsically at odds with our best interests, so everything has this underlying tension to it introduced by monetization. That wasn't there in the beginning. It was just people doing their thing, being social and hanging out. Like it is here.
Unknown parent

Aaron
@another_katt @kralcttam I don't think it was better, honestly. There were other things that were very wrong with the world, that have gotten better, alongside the things that have gotten worse. For example, we have much better visibility into the harms and dangers our behaviors have on each other, thanks to social media, and this lets us be more supportive and kinder to each other. I don't think the #ActuallyAutistic community could have existed back then, much less have actively worked shoulder to shoulder alongside other marginalized groups to fight for human rights as we do now.

I have the same perspective as you on nostalgia, I think. We should strive for the best outcome going forward, because that's what we have (limited) control over. But the past should inform those efforts. History is the experience we learn from.
in reply to Aaron

The fediverse is very much like early 1990s B.B.S. (bulletin board service) reimagined for 2023.
in reply to Aaron

spread? Do people viscerally understand the principles at play? How about with regard to money?
in reply to 2¢

@Qbitzerre I'm not sure I understand your question as stated.
@
in reply to 2¢

the evolution of network communication has brought us to a point where people are encouraged to happily surrender the control and autonomy of their spheres of communication. It can be frustrating to watch this submission.

Does not the evolving financial system present the same threat? Or are people also blind to that - perhaps even more so?
in reply to 2¢

@Qbitzerre
The "network" doesn't cause this behavior, and it predates "The Network" by millennia. Humans have been "happily surrendering the control and autonomy of their spheres of communication" for thousands of years.

It's called groupthink, one of the nastiest symptoms of TRIBALISM. It's not new, and has nothing to do with the Internet. It has everything to do with tribalism. The Internet merely adds grease to the whole process by eradicating geography as a barrier.
@
in reply to VulcanTourist [MOVED]

@VulcanTourist it's the grease (accelerants) I refer to as a concern. And you are right, it is a timeless problem. Now, back to the discussion?

Are you suggesting that tools of control and oppression should be of no concern?
in reply to 2¢

@Qbitzerre
It's every bit as much a tool of questioning, critique, revolt, and rebellion as it might be a tool of control and oppression. You mis-perceive who's losing that contest, I think. That network you fear is very likely aiding the progressive rejection of organized religion and mythology, and I can think of no better example of control and oppression than that.

The tool isn't causal. The cause is the hands that wield it. Vigilance is required, always and forever.
@
Unknown parent

Aaron
True, but I see it as a combination of that and systemic issues. Our laws and culture are set up specifically in support of the notion that the majority of economic activity is centered around profit. Anything else is treated like some kind of side show, a special exception for nonconformists. Imagine if the reverse were true, and cooperatives were the standard form for corporations. Better yet, what if there were no stock market at all, and to exit a startup meant converting it to a cooperative and selling it to the community stakeholders whose welfare is directly affected?

It's my hope that experiencing cooperative-style organizations first-hand, especially at the point of inception, will help people to see the value of this approach and start thinking of different ways to systemize our economic activity. We need to establish a new normal, because the current one is broken.
Ten wpis został zedytowany (1 rok temu)
in reply to Aaron

I do share similar hopes about social media. I see corporate social media today like the #CompuServe and #AmericaOnLine/#AOL of the 1990s before standardized internet email became commonplace and you could be with any provider and choose your domain.
in reply to Aaron

I think of the fediverse as the old social web, before the tech giants destroyed the empathetic side of things. This is what I remember and loved from the golden age of social media.

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Aaron

A question is how will the Oligarch-tech industrialists attack the fediverse? What angles will they take?

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Timo

@timo21 Good question, and one that will become more pertinent as it grows. I don't have answers as yet.
@Timo
in reply to Aaron

i hope. reminds me a bit of early myspace, when socializing and a good time was not quite so targeted and monetized...
in reply to Aaron

I've said as much in a blog post I did months ago. Always remember, those that own the media control the propaganda. Provided Lippmann is wrong, we can build our own media.

Aaron reshared this.

in reply to Aaron

In the WayBack I visualized a vast ‘net of minds’. At the time I was thinking schizo thoughts like this, DARPA had just begun. It may well be that finally we will have a ‘net of minds’ so humanity can finally be cognizant of all of itself, and stop the stupidity of the last eons. We are all being touched by the world’s events and more than ever, we are screaming ‘Stop! No More’ of war, of ecocide, of old oppressive codes and economics.